Balkan
Witness
Home

 

BALKAN WITNESS

Articles on the Bosnia Conflict

 

Search
Balkan
Witness


Bosnia-Herzegovina Journal #6: Krajina - Kozarac, Prijedor
By Peter Lippman
November 6, 2012


2012 Journal index

Journal 1: Sarajevo. September 25
Journal 2: Tuzla. October 11
Journal 3: Srebrenica. October 13
Journal 4: Bratunac, Višegrad, Elections. October 26
Journal 5: Krajina - Banja Luka. November 6
Journal 6: Krajina - Kozarac, Prijedor. November 12
Journal 7: Guilt, Responsibility, and Politics. November 20
Journal 8:Travnik, Mostar, Animal Farm. December 13
Journal 9
: Activism in Sarajevo, Return to Srebrenica, Prijedor Revisited, December 19
Journal 10:
Krila Nade; The Missing; Tycoon Arrested; March 1st Coalition, December 26
Journal 11: Macedonia and Kosovo, January 2, 2013
Journal 12: The Roma of Kosovo, January 11, 2013
Journal 13: A Visit to Germany, January 29, 2013

Previous journals and articles

To contact Peter in response to these reports or any of his articles,

JavaScript must be enabled to display this email address.


This report continues and wraps up my visit last week to the Krajina, northwest Bosnia. I have put a few links at the end of this posting, for background on Kozarac, Prijedor, and related history.

From Banja Luka I went west to Kozarac, which lies most of the way to the town of Prijedor. The bus between Banja Luka and Prijedor passes the exits for the former concentration camp sites of Omarska and Trnopolje, and goes right by Keraterm.

I slept at the “Kuća mira,” the House of Peace. At the upper end of Kozarac, this building was formerly the elementary school. Like nearly every other building and house in Kozarac, it was torched and bombed during the war, and left as a hulk. I was present on a dreary April day in 1998 when Emsuda Mujagić, leader of the women’s organization Srcem do Mira (Through Heart to Peace) planted a “peace tree” next to the ruins of the building and declared that it would be rebuilt and a community center created there. This was before any of the thousands of displaced Bosniaks had started to return to Kozarac. The atmosphere was foreboding. I thought Emsuda was fantasizing.

Not long afterwards, someone ripped out the “tree of peace.” However, return to Kozarac got underway, and today some thousands of the pre-war residents have returned. The old elementary school building was beautifully restored, and today it indeed serves as a center for non-governmental activity and, occasionally, as a haven for wandering visitors.

Overnight it snowed. I had an early meeting in Prijedor - though not as early as I thought, since I was unaware of the change to standard time, which occurs in Bosnia-Herzegovina a week before it does the United States.


The new look of Kozarac

Sudbin

I met with Sudbin Musić, secretary of the Udruženje Logoraša Prijedor ’92 (Association of Concentration Camp Prisoners, Prijedor 1992). He was a survivor of Trnopolje. On one hand, he looks like a young 38-year-old. On the other, his pale face gives a somewhat ghostly, not-so-robust effect that you can only assume is the result of a traumatic experience from which there is no complete recovery. But, somehow, Sudbin is energetic, mentally lively, with an abundant sense of humor and irony. He conveys his feeling of the tragedy and difficulty of his constituency’s situation, and the obstacles both within that community and from the outside - through biting sarcasm - but sometimes also through playfulness.

Sudbin told me about himself: “My father was killed in our village of Čarakovo at the beginning of the war. I spent two years in Holland and four in Germany, and then I returned. I came to Sanski Most in 1998.  Three days after I returned, they called me into the army. A week after that, my father’s body was discovered in a well. So there was no traditional going-away party for me. I spent ten months in the army.

“There were 700 houses destroyed in Čarakovo; it looked like Hiroshima. I returned there with my family in 2000. There were two hundred families that wanted to return, but we were only able to get donations to repair forty houses. It was like in Rwanda, you could find human bones everywhere. I found a skull in the garden.

“My first ‘hobby’ was taking care of funeral arrangements, helping people identify the remains, coordinating with the ICMP [International Commission for Missing Persons]. My God, what a hobby. I started to become well known because of my activism. I’m 38; I was 25-26 when I returned.

“The return process ended in 2003. And in that year, people started to leave. The older people are dying, and the younger ones are leaving if they can. They get married to someone abroad and then leave. This is the last phase of the ethnic cleansing.

“In 1991, 2,417 people lived in Čarakovo; the village was 99% Muslim. From there, 413 people were killed. The rest were taken to concentration camps, then deported to central Bosnia, and they then left for Europe and elsewhere.

“In 2003 there were 462 returnees. Now about 350 people live there. There are 26 children in the elementary school, first through fifth grade. That is a picture of the success of the ethnic cleansing.”

Sudbin discussed with me the struggle of his organization for the rights of the concentration camp survivors. He said, The question of memory is the most essential one. There need to be reparations, and we are working on the status of the survivors. My association is not ethnically-oriented. We are struggling for the rights of all survivors. That is why we have no money, because we are not nationalist. There is too much politicization of this issue.”

Spring of 2012 was the twentieth anniversary of the beginning of the war, the attacks on Prijedor and Kozarac from surrounding Serb separatist forces, and the formation of the concentration camps. There has been an upsurge of activism in the municipality - and on the Internet as well. Survivors and returnees in Prijedor have been fighting to have the crimes that were committed against them acknowledged and commemorated, for example, at Omarska. To date there has been strong resistance against this campaign, especially from the municipal government headed by Mayor Marko Pavić.

“I’m president of the committee for organization of funerals. More victims are being exhumed and identified each year. The funerals are held on July 20th. There are three parts of Prijedor municipality [that were inhabited by Muslims and that were targeted]: Kozarac was the first that was destroyed. Then the Old Town and other Muslim parts of the city. Then the communities on the left bank of the Sana were destroyed between July 20th and 26th of 1992. Of all the people killed, 95% were Muslim, including women, children, and old people [The rest were other non-Serbs, primarily Croats]. No one has been arrested or prosecuted for these crimes. We are using this day, July 20th, to show the local community and the world that no one knows about these things.


Mourner at cemetery of wartime victims, Kozarac

“And we are talking about the 256 women and 102 children who were killed. We were going to do an exhibit about the women, but this was forbidden by Pavić. He is the Pharaoh. He is Ramses. He says, ‘You have to do what I say, and think like I do.’ But we did a commemoration for the children, and that was a success. We held a procession through Prijedor, carrying children’s school bags. We walked starting at noon and finished at 1:00 p.m.

Q: How was this received?
A: “Nothing happened. Then we did something for Human Rights Day on December 10, and again it was received with indifference. But the municipal assembly called a special session, exclusively to talk about our use of the word ‘genocide.’”

I asked if the struggle for commemoration at Omarska would continue. Sudbin said, “Yes, but how? There is no money. We got a letter from Pavić that there would be no money from the municipality for this kind of work, and there is no support from the UNDP either. We are fighting the fight of Don Quixote.”

Sudbin discussed the position of various return communities and the capital city: “The return communities are like reservations. These are local microcosms with micro-economies. Kozarac is Dubai. It is the golden goose, based on good agricultural land, tourism, and agriculture, some industry.

“And there is a very large microcosm in Sarajevo, which is the Hong Kong of Bosnia. It sucks money from the rest of the country. People there don’t understand that there is also Bosnia on the other side of Trebević [a mountain to the southeast of Sarajevo].

“Politics in this country is based on the economics of privatization. In five years we won’t have our own politics, but that of Zarubezhnjeft [Russian oil company], Mittal [international steel company that bought the Omarska mining complex], the Austrians. That is neo-colonialism.

“So in a few years my human rights job will make no sense; I will be in danger, because I will be disturbing the Bosniaks. I feel like the last Mohican.”

Graffiti

In Prijedor I noticed an anonymous inscription on the outside wall of a restaurant, in Cyrillic. It read, “Milorad Lukashenko,” combining the first name of RS President Dodik with the last name of the dictator of Belarus.


Graffiti calling Dodik "Lukashenko "

Edin Ramulić, Izvor

Edin Ramulić is the secretary of the predominantly women’s organization Izvor (Source). This organization campaigns for the rights of the families of missing persons. Izvor collects information about missing persons, advocates for the rights of the relatives of the disappeared, supports prosecution of the war crimes cases, and promotes public discussion of the history of the war. This latter work focuses, among other things, on the rights of rape victims.

Edin says, “Prijedor has the most war criminals of any single place. There were 28 people from here who were convicted of war crimes in The Hague, in the Bosnian court, and in Belgrade. There is nowhere else that there were so many concentrated war crimes. And this area has the biggest number of concentration camp survivors, and the highest number of missing people - there are still one thousand people missing, and sometimes there has been no DNA sample provided to identify them.
 
“All of us have a relative who is missing. There were 3,173 people who were disappeared. We created a book of the disappeared, and it has come out in three issues, in 1998, 2000, and 2012. The first issue was the first evidence about the missing in Bosnia-Herzegovina. The government had done nothing.

“We followed the exhumations, helped with information. No one lived here in Prijedor then. We got in touch with the relatives of the disappeared. There are still remains of the missing being found this year. We have a database. There are still one thousand missing people.

“…The relatives of the disappeared people now have the right to the status of family of the disappeared. This was established in Bosnia overall in 2006, and in the RS in 2007. But there are around 500 people who have not received this status. There was a very short time period where people were allowed to apply. Some 700 people applied. With the status of family of a missing person one receives a pension. In the RS it is around 140 KM; it is better in the Federation.

“The Ministry of Soldiers deals with these cases. Mišo Rodić is the head of the department for disabled veterans’ pensions. He’s an assistant to Pavić. He was involved in the concentration camps. He doesn’t deny this, says, ‘I did my job.’

“Furthermore, Mirzad Islamović was in the camps. Now, he is the head of the department of economy. So he is Rodić’s colleague. Rodić had the power to say who was going to be killed and who was going to get a beating. Now, the two of them eat lunch together.

I asked, “Is this a case of reconciliation?” Edin responded, “Yes it is, on a personal level.”

The city of Sanski Most sits on the other side of the inter-entity borderline, in the Federation, just a twenty-minute drive from Prijedor. When it was taken by Serb forces in 1992, Edin tells me, there were around 700 Bosniak and Croat civilians killed. Combined Bosniak and Croat forces retook the city in 1995, and some Serb civilians were killed or expelled. Edin says, “In 2009 we held a conference in Sanski Most. One Serb spoke there about crimes committed against the Serbs when Sanski Most was retaken. But this has never happened again.

 “Prijedor has the highest number of war criminals who have confessed to their crimes, but most of this happened far away from here, in The Hague, so people don’t know about it. So we share that information here, and that gives a chance for reconciliation.

At another local conference, Edin said, “Zdravka Karlica came to speak with us from the Serb organization of fallen soldiers. Her husband, Zoran, was killed in the war. If anyone had a reason to hate us, she would, but she doesn’t. And there were some other Serbs, some whose sons were killed. There was also a man who was injured in fighting between Bosniaks and Serbs on May 30, 1992. He was shot 32 times, and still he survived. He spoke with us; this was a very positive story.”

Q: Are these people in favor of reconciliation?
A: “Everyone is, except for the politicians.”

“In 2011 we had a conference with Croats from the Association for Return to the Valley of the Sana River. Hrvatski Dom. This was a conference to help the Croats. Again, Pavić didn’t attend. His letter said that we were working to create an ugly picture of Prijedor. But it wasn’t us who did that; we are not guilty of that.”

There has been strong resistance to the erection of a commemorative monument, or for that matter any other kind of commemoration, at Omarska. One of the forms of obstruction has been cooptation. That’s too complicated a story for me to go into here, but Mittal and the local government, together with some outside “reconciliation careerists,” have had considerable success in thwarting the movement for memorialization. Meanwhile, monuments to Serb soldiers are erected in many places. Edin reports,

“There are Serb victims, and the municipality erects monuments to them, but none for the Muslims. The only public place where there is a commemorative marking is at Keraterm. Within 200 meters of the municipal building, there are five monuments to Serbs. One is to Rašković, the Croatian Serb founder of the SDS [the Serb Democratic Party, whose Bosnian branch was led by Radovan Karadžić]. This was perhaps placed there to please the displaced Serbs from Croatia.”


Monument to Serb fighters placed by wartime location of concentration camp at Trnopolje, near Prijedor

Mirsad Duratović

I met with Mirsad Duratović, the president of Sudbin’s concentration camp survivors’ organization. Sudbin had told me that when Mirsad was 17 at the beginning of the war, Serb separatist forces killed eleven members of his family, including his father and his grandfather, “all in two minutes.” Mirsad survived Omarska, Manjaca, and Trnopolje concentration camps.

Mirsad discussed the work of his organization: “There are around 4,000 registered members. 90% of them live abroad. Some of them come here once or twice a year. There is also the Association of Kozarac Camp Survivors, led by Sabahudin Garibović. And some of the people from Kozarac are members of our association.

“We are mainly involved in commemorating the anniversaries of the opening and closing of the camps. Camp survivors do not have the status of civilian victims of the war. They have no legal status as such. That is one of the things we are struggling to accomplish. The issue has now been in court for four years.

“Q: What would be involved in having that status?
A: “There is some material benefit, a pension. But we don’t just need that material benefit; we also need the recognition of the pain in our spirit.

“In his trial at The Hague, Karadžić said that the war started on the 30th of May, when the Croats and Muslims attacked Prijedor. But on May 22nd, the Serbs had already attacked my village of Biščani. They killed my father and my fifteen-year-old brother, my grandfather as well, and three of my uncles. I am the only male survivor from that family. And by the 30th of May, the concentration camps were full.

“We are not being allowed to place a monument in Omarska, nor in Prijedor. That’s what hurts us. We need recognition from the government that crimes happened here. There is no amount of money that can assuage that pain. There is no law regarding a deadline to finish this process. The other day one woman who had been in Omarska died. Who will remember all this?

Q: What’s going on now with the campaign for memorialization in Omarska?
A: “The main obstruction here is the city government; the mayor is preventing it. We have contact with Mittal; they say that when the government gives its approval, they will help. The problem is not with the company at all.

“If the government were to permit the memorial, that would be an admission. Now, there are six monuments for fallen Serbs, and none for our side. There is one monument for the fallen police, another for mailmen, another for hospital workers, and another for miners - but these are only for the Serb members of these professions.

“There is not only discrimination here towards the dead. There is discrimination in hiring as well. Serb veterans get priority. Their children receive scholarships, but ours do not.

I asked Mirsad if he thought that what exists in Prijedor conforms to the legal definition of apartheid. He answered, “The government provides 500,000 KM for the victims of the war - but only for the Serbs, and this is written into the law. That money goes to five or six Serb veterans organizations. We have six organizations here of Croats and Muslims. So this is legalized discrimination - and this is money that partially comes from the taxes that we pay.

“They also reserve funds for the monuments to the Serb soldiers, and to their organizations, but nothing for our side. We have a case about this pending in the EU Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.”

Q: Is there a complete halt to the campaign for a commemorative monument at Omarska?
A: “We don’t know what to do. We tried to go to London for the press conference, but we were not able to get visas.

“The international community could help us if it wanted to, as it did in Srebrenica. But it is playing its own game. If they were able to take care of this problem in Srebrenica, then why can’t they do so here?

“We need to have a memorial center in Omarska, and one in Prijedor as well. If this were to be done, then we would be able to move on. As it is now, I do not have the right in Prijedor to commemorate the day of the death of my parents.


Omarska mining complex, wartime concentration camp

“More than one thousand of those who were killed have not yet been found. There were drivers and other people who were involved, who were witnesses. There are people who know what was done. So why can’t they find those missing people? There are at least five witnesses of what happened in my village who have already spoken. Some of them have testified in The Hague - but no prosecutor has taken any action.

“If you were in my place, what would you do? My grandmother, my other relatives, are gone. I must look for them and find them; then life can go on. Why is it like this? There are prosecutors in Sarajevo, at the state level, who could do something.”

The weekend that I was in Prijedor was the time of the major Muslim holiday, Kurban Bajram, as I mentioned in my previous report. Mirsad noted this, saying, “Now it’s Bajram. Ordinarily, that’s a holiday where the whole family gets together, something like Christmas for the Catholics. But I’m sitting with my mother alone, and Sudbin with his, and it’s sad. I don’t like this holiday.

“What have I been waiting for, for fifteen years? In ten more years I won’t be capable of doing this work, I’m already sick from the results of the beatings in the camps. I have problems with my stomach, and they injured my arm.

“The people who were convicted of committing war crimes and who are becoming active now again in politics are saying things like, ‘We served our time, now we are free to do what we want.’”

At this point the recounting of the tragedy, the misery, and the denial and obstruction was affecting me. I felt close to tears. I could hardly fathom the will to persevere on the part of these activist survivors.

I brought up something that has occurred to me, a form of on-the-edge activism that has been practiced in the United States, admittedly with much less risk:

Q: You are aware of the Occupy movement in the US. What do you think of the idea of doing something like that here, for example, sitting at the entrance to Omarska as a protest?
A: “There are not the people for that. Here there are perhaps around 5,000 people. If there were 500 of those who would participate, it would just be a small effort. We have organized some actions, although it is prohibited.

“There is fear. If the authorities see that your organization is doing this kind of thing, then the government says that you are ‘rebels,’ and then you get no assistance from the municipality.”

Q: What kind of assistance do organizations get?
A: “For example, scholarships for students to go to school. Employment.”

“We have no money; how can we pay the rent? Courage is useless in this regard. And there have been threats against us. There is economic pressure, and when that doesn’t work, there is physical pressure. The saddest thing is that the police don’t do anything about those threats of violence. And people come from the international community, but they don’t help.

“There are people who are leaving. So they won’t talk about these things. Whoever can leave, is leaving. Regardless of how patriotic you are, you still have to have something to live on. (Looks out the window at the weather) - You can’t live on snow. We have children; they want chocolate, they want a bicycle. If you have nothing to eat, you pack your trunks and you leave.

“In the last year there were thirty returnees who died, and no one was born here. It’s the third year that it’s been like that. We have three schools in the six villages around my area. There were five schools, now there are three. When I was in first grade in Biščani, there were 36 students in the first grade. In those six villages there were 250 students in first grade.

“Now there are thirteen. In the different schools, there is one student here, and maybe two there, in first grade. Next year, maybe altogether there will be four students in first grade. When we first returned, there were sixty students in the four-year elementary schools. Now there are 36. Next year there will be fewer than thirty.

“When those people reach twenty years of age, they go looking for work - not in Prijedor, but at least in Slovenia or Croatia, or beyond. They leave. In the last twelve years there have been hundreds of weddings here; all of those married couples left.

“Sudbin and I were born in 1974; we are the last generation of people who are staying here. Now the process of ethnic cleansing is finishing. It is the same for the Serbs in the Federation. People who are in the minorities are leaving from the smaller cities. Serbs are even leaving from Drvar in the Federation, where they have a Serb mayor; but they mean nothing to the Federation.

Mirsad asks, rhetorically, “Why did the OHR [Office of the High Representative] not remove Dodik?” I responded that “the OHR gave up on making a difference in that way a long time ago. There appears to be no long-term plan for Bosnia-Herzegovina on anyone’s part - except for that of Dodik.”

Mirsad commented, “Everything is going according to that plan. But he is not acting alone.

“If you want help from the international community or the courts, or from an Embassy, you can’t criticize them. Some organizations have consented to those conditions. But our task is to point out our problems - so what can we do?

“Some of the NGOs have become satellites of the government. They can criticize the government. But they have to choose between receiving money or being beaten.

“An Arab Spring or Occupy movement can’t happen here - there is too much at stake. What’s going on in Greece? It’s worse here, but no one is responding. Governments come and go, they keep stealing, and there is no prosecution when someone new comes into power. That is because the next person in power knows that he could end up in the same position.

“We lack the critical mass for a rebellion. The government keeps a good eye on potentially active people - and buys them off if necessary.”

Kozarac

Back in Kozarac, I fit in a couple of quick conversations with local folks who have been active, since the end of the war, in rebuilding their lives and in rebuilding Kozarac. I wrote about the work of activist and camp survivor Švabo in 2010.*

With his organization Optimisti, Švabo has been active in the struggle for memorialization. Among other things, he has traveled and educated himself about the nature of other memorials, especially those related to the Holocaust. He has gone to symposia at Auschwitz and at Dachau. He says, “
We need to have an entire concept of a memorial center. That has to include even the restrooms, and there must be a director, a memorial section, a film room, and an archives, and so on.” But, as mentioned, all this is blocked for now, in one way or another.

“Meanwhile,” Švabo says, “we can have a web site. Other memorials have a web site to augment the work of their centers; we can start with one.”

Regarding the stalled struggle for a memorial at Omarska, I asked Švabo whether he thought it would be possible for people to mass at Omarska, something like an Occupy action. He did not want to be pessimistic; he said, “Local people here aren’t prepared to mobilize for something like that. But I think something like that action could be done…”

Švabo turned to the problem of outside support for Kozarac. “There were 22 weddings here in one day, all from the diaspora. There were 7,000 people present. People in the diaspora come here for vacation, but they are letting go…”

The international community and the relevant court at The Hague have restricted all discussion of genocide to Srebrenica, while genocide arguably occurred in many parts of Bosnia-Herzegovina - certainly in Prijedor and in Višegrad. People who survived the destruction of the Bosniak communities outside of Srebrenica need recognition of their experience just as much as do those from Srebrenica.

Švabo said, “If there was not genocide in Prijedor, then there is no such thing. I carry that genocide on my shoulders - I was in the camps, I saw the beatings and the killings. So I don’t need there to be a decision in order to know there was genocide.”


War memorial to civilian victims, Kozarac

I spoke with my old friends Emsuda and Osman Mujagić, who were among the first to return to Kozarac in 1998-1999. Emsuda told me that there were around eight thousand returnees to Kozarac and the surrounding villages (out of a pre-war population of 27,000), and overall in the Prijedor municipality, around 24,000 returnees - “though people have left. Now there are fewer people. People came back, saw that there was no work, and left again. Young people are leaving.”

Srcem do Mira, a women’s organization founded in 1993 in exile, actively participated in the uphill struggle for return to Kozarac in the postwar period.* In the first years after return, the organization was involved in a wide range of issues from education to a crafts cooperative to various kinds of training. Now, Emsuda says, Srcem do Mira has reduced its projects, as other organizations have formed. “Now we mainly work with older women, in psycho-social activities. And we help younger women prepare to start a business. Other organizations that use the Kuća Mira include sports groups, the cultural-artistic association, and the hunting club.”

In recent years Emsuda had described to me various kinds of harassment that returnees to Kozarac had suffered at the hands of the local authorities. I asked if this kind of treatment was still going on. Emsuda told me about an investor, a Kozarac returnee from Norway who “three years ago invested a million KM in a cattle farm where he wanted to produce healthy food and bio-fuel. Throwing mountains of paperwork at him, government has still not given permission to run his company, so he can’t hire anyone.” The entire Bosnian-Herzegovinan economy is shackled by this kind of red tape, discouraging much foreign investment. But it can particularly be felt as discrimination in the return communities.

And it sounds like there is real economic discrimination in Kozarac that overcomes any other possible explanation: “There is all kinds of harassment, still. The finance inspectors come to the local businesses. There, the cash registers are electronically connected to the tax agency. If there is more or less money in the register than there is supposed to be (based on sales), then the owner can be fined 500 KM. And one owner was fined 500 KM for not having the box that the cash register came in.

Q: Why can they fine someone for not having the box?
A: “Because there wasn’t something else to fine them for. But they don’t bother the Serb businessmen about this - they don’t even have to have a cash register.”


Mosque in Kozarac

Leaving the Krajina

I could have stayed in Prijedor, and revisited Banja Luka. There were more people to talk to, interesting discussions to be had - maybe even some uplifting ones. But at this point I was chilled to the bone. I stopped by a Chinese store and bought a cheap but warm scarf, a pair of long johns, and thick socks (“rabbit hair?”), but this did not warm the chill in my spirit, the building annoyance, the sympathetic frustration, the anger. Even seeing the name “Republika Srpska” painted on the trains irritated me. I had to leave the RS. I had to get out.

One last unhappy experience, of my own making, awaited me at the Banja Luka trainyard. There, on the periphery, was an older man selling cheap goods. His stand was dominated by t-shirts bearing the picture of Draža Mihajlović and other Chetnik propaganda (see my discussion of the movement to rehabilitate World War II royalist Mihajlović in my last report). Although I knew that this t-shirt was widely available in the RS, seeing it now got on my nerves. I should’ve kept my mouth shut. But, remembering what Dražana said [see my previous report], I said to the man, “So, fascism is cool now, huh?” He answered, “What, where do you see fascism?” I said, “Here, all around you.” I walked away.

At this the man started yelling to everyone (except, fortunately, there was no one around) and, tentatively, walking towards me. I kept walking and ignored him, and he subsided.

I knew that my comment was not going to do any good and that I should have either just moved on or tried something different. My bad mood wouldn’t allow me, but I could have asked him, “Tell me, what do you like about “Draža Mihajlović?”

Or maybe I should have asked, “Do you have any Hitler t-shirts?”

*

Back in Sarajevo, I talked to Dževad and reminded him of his earlier comment: “I can’t believe that in Banja Luka they don’t know what happened in Prijedor.” I told him that I had mentioned this to two young activists in Banja Luka and they said that people don’t know, and that there are only a couple of places that you can get Oslobodjenje or Dani in Banja Luka, and that what is mostly available are propagandistic media such as Glas Srpske, Nezavisne Novine, and Blic.

Dževad said, “They have access to every TV station, etc, how can they not know?”

I said, “It’s the same problem with us, people don’t know that the US killed two million in Southeast Asia, and now some hundreds of thousands in Iraq, and then Afghanistan, and then the drone planes killing civilians in Pakistan, etc…”

Dževad: “But those things are taking place in another country, this was right next door, you could see the houses on fire!”

“…And now, whenever I meet a Serb policeman, he hurries to tell me that he was not involved in ‘those actions.’ Yes, they were all cooks. The army was full of cooks.”

*

And I talked to Hikmet about the same issue of ignorance versus denial in Banja Luka. He said, “In Banja Luka they had to know about what happened to the Ferhadija mosque, at least. It was blown up. Then the bulldozers came. The mosques were plundered and torched, and then even the stones from the mosques were cleared away. It wasn’t just individuals who did this. This was done officially.”

Srebrenica Results: More Delay

The vote count from the Srebrenica municipal elections was known almost a month ago: 4,455 valid votes for Muslim candidate Ćamil Duraković, and 3,663 for Serb candidate Vesna Kočević. The official results from all the municipalities were confirmed last week, just before the one-month deadline - except for a few. There were a couple of municipalities or, in some cases, polling districts, where chicanery was revealed and the vote will be repeated.

Nor was Srebrenica’s result confirmed, but this was different; the “Coalition for the Republika Srpska,” representing the parties that supported Kočević, filed a complaint with the Central Election Commission. Chair of the Commission Branko Petrić supported the complaint and proposed that the elections be annulled due to “irregularities and infractions,” but he was outvoted by others on the Commission. However, now the Coalition is taking its complaint to the Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina, so nothing is certain.

***********************

*For previous writings relevant to these topics, see the following:

Some of my early writing on Emsuda Mujagić’s work with Srcem do Mira (see issues 2 through 10)

Kozarac and Prijedor, 2008

Kozarac - Prijedor, 2010

Remembering Mladen Grahovac

Index of previous journals and articles

 


Balkan Witness Home Page

Articles index
 


LETTERS from KOSOVO and BOSNIA, by PETER LIPPMAN

Articles by Roger Lippman

VIDEO      BOOKS      MAPS

RELATED INFORMATIONAL SITES

SEARCH BALKAN WITNESS

Contact Balkan Witness

Report broken links